iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® High Dividend ETF (SPYD) share 10 holdings, with roughly 5.3% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: DGRO October 23, 2026 · SPYD October 29, 2026.
Fund pages: DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) · SPYD (State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® High Dividend ETF)
Weight overlap
5.3%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
10
Securities in both funds
Funds
DGRO · SPYD
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In DGRO | In SPYD | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEPPEPSICO | 1.76% | 1.27% | 0.49%DGRO |
| ACNACCENTURE CL A | 1.17% | 2.27% | 1.10%SPYD |
| MDTMEDTRONIC | 0.83% | 1.52% | 0.69%SPYD |
| DUKDUKE ENERGY INDIANA | 0.77% | 1.26% | 0.49%SPYD |
| EOGEOG RESOURCES | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.92%SPYD |
| ARESARES MANAGEMENT | 0.22% | 1.37% | 1.15%SPYD |
| HONHONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL | 0.21% | 1.23% | 1.02%SPYD |
| EVRGEVERGY | 0.15% | 1.27% | 1.12%SPYD |
| MKCMCCORMICK + NON VTG SHRS | 0.10% | 1.16% | 1.06%SPYD |
| MOSMOSAIC | 0.04% | 1.02% | 0.98%SPYD |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In DGRO | In SPYD |
|---|---|---|
Financial Services | 19.2% | 12.4% |
Consumer Defensive | 12.8% | 13.8% |
Technology | 18.3% | 6.4% |
Real Estate | 0.0% | 24.3% |
Healthcare | 17.6% | 4.4% |
Utilities | 7.1% | 10.9% |
Industrials | 10.4% | 3.9% |
Consumer Cyclical | 6.2% | 6.7% |
Energy | 6.0% | 5.7% |
Basic Materials | 2.3% | 6.4% |
Communication Services | 0.1% | 5.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
DGRO
SPYD
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.