ETF & mutual fund overlap · Page updated November 1, 2026

DIVO vs SMH: Holdings Overlap

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 1 holdings, with roughly 3.9% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Holdings as of: DIVO October 28, 2026 · SMH October 29, 2026.

Fund pages: DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) · SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)

Weight overlap

3.9%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

1

Securities in both funds

Funds

DIVO · SMH

Compared side by side

DIVO holds other funds. Weight overlap looks through to what those hold — 2 funds, covering 100% of DIVO's weight.

Compare DIVO and SMH live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 1 holdings DIVO and SMH share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn DIVOIn SMHWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA3.85%19.62%15.77%SMH

Sector exposure: DIVO vs SMH

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn DIVOIn SMH
Technology
16.5%100.0%
Financial Services
24.8%0.0%
Healthcare
18.0%0.0%
Industrials
12.7%0.0%
Energy
6.5%0.0%
Basic Materials
5.5%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
5.2%0.0%
Consumer Defensive
4.3%0.0%
Communication Services
4.2%0.0%
Utilities
2.4%0.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in DIVO and SMH

DIVO

SMH


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Computed on November 1, 2026 from the latest holdings each fund has published (dated at the top of the page). Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.