iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) share 10 holdings, with roughly 0% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: IEMG October 23, 2026 · ITOT October 29, 2026.
Fund pages: IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) · ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF)
Weight overlap
0%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
10
Securities in both funds
Funds
IEMG · ITOT
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In IEMG | In ITOT | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNHCNH INDUSTRIAL NV | 0.01% | 0.01% | ≈ even |
| AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources | 0.01% | <0.01% | 0.01%IEMG |
| ALRSAlerus Financial | 0.00% | <0.01% | ≈ even |
| COPCONOCOPHILLIPS | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.24%ITOT |
| EGPEastGroup Properties | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01%ITOT |
| FIVEFive Below | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.02%ITOT |
| HCIHCI Group | 0.00% | <0.01% | ≈ even |
| IDRIdaho Strategic Resources | 0.00% | <0.01% | ≈ even |
| SRESEMPRA | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.08%ITOT |
| -RENT THE RUNWAY | 0.00% | 0.00% | ≈ even |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In IEMG | In ITOT |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 39.6% | 37.0% |
Financial Services | 19.5% | 12.1% |
Consumer Cyclical | 7.9% | 9.1% |
Industrials | 7.3% | 8.8% |
Healthcare | 3.4% | 10.6% |
Communication Services | 5.7% | 7.8% |
Basic Materials | 6.2% | 1.9% |
Consumer Defensive | 3.1% | 4.6% |
Energy | 3.6% | 3.9% |
Utilities | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Real Estate | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
IEMG
ITOT
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.