VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF (XSD) share 14 holdings, with roughly 28.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: SMH October 29, 2026 · XSD October 23, 2026.
Fund pages: SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) · XSD (State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF)
Weight overlap
28.6%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
14
Securities in both funds
Funds
SMH · XSD
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In SMH | In XSD | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS | 5.49% | 3.01% | 2.48%SMH |
| ADIANALOG DEVICES | 4.79% | 2.96% | 1.83%SMH |
| QCOMQUALCOMM | 4.06% | 2.75% | 1.31%SMH |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 5.58% | 2.74% | 2.84%SMH |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 4.00% | 2.68% | 1.32%SMH |
| NVDANVIDIA | 19.62% | 2.60% | 17.02%SMH |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 5.53% | 2.44% | 3.09%SMH |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 4.67% | 2.36% | 2.31%SMH |
| INTCINTEL | 4.00% | 2.26% | 1.74%SMH |
| NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 1.23% | 2.90% | 1.67%XSD |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 1.15% | 2.62% | 1.47%XSD |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.99% | 2.36% | 1.37%XSD |
| MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY | 0.88% | 2.80% | 1.92%XSD |
| ONON SEMICONDUCTOR | 0.50% | 2.81% | 2.31%XSD |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In SMH | In XSD |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 100.0% | 99.5% |
Industrials | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
SMH
XSD
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.